Township of Norton v. Cockerill
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, C. J.
The purpose of this suit was to set aside proceedings to establish and construct a certain drain known as Ruddiman No. 3 drain in the township of Norton, Muskegon county, Michigan.
The proceedings were under the general drain law (Act No. 316, Pub. Acts 1923 [see as amended 1 Comp. Laws 1929, §4838 et seg.]). The undisputed facts show that the construction was not a drain but was in fact and law a sewer. The trial court so held and accordingly decreed from which no appeal has been taken. This appeal is by the plaintiffs and the only question involved is their right to recover the assessments…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lingle v. Township of ElmwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by11 opinions
- O'HARA v. Oakland CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- Romulus City Treasurer v. Wayne County Drain CommissionerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Price Paper Corp. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Brooks v. County of OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Real Estate Exchange Corp. v. Muskegon County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.