Heliker v. Oakland County
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Oakland; Williams (William B.), J., presiding. Assumpsit by Charles E. Heliker against the county of Oakland for taxes paid under protest. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
In the summer of 1917 the highway commissioners of Oakland county were petitioned, under the provisions of the Covert act, to improve a certain highway extending in a northerly direction from the Grand River road through the township of Farming-, ton, a distance of nearly 5 miles. In response to the petition the commissioners laid out the road, created *596a special assessment district, sold the bonds and let the contract. The road was subsequently constructed and the contractor paid. Plaintiff and certain other land owners living in the special assessment district paid their taxes under protest…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Auditor General v. BoltMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Township of Clarence v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Crandall v. McElhenyMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Strack v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Grandchamp v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by6 opinions
- Township of Lake v. MillarMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Stellwagen v. DingmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Auditor General v. Union Lake Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Altermatt v. DillmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Anderson v. Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.