Legal Opinion
Clinton v. Spencer
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 7, 1930No. Docket No. 62, Calendar No. 34,648PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
Anselm J. Smith et al:, plaintiffs in one suit, and Theresa C. Clinton et al., plaintiffs in another, brought separate actions against A. W. Spencer, county drain commissioner of Oakland county, Floyd H. Losee, Oakland county treasurer, John E. Ferguson, township treasurer of Southfield township, and also against S. A. Healy and E. D. Baker Company, both of Detroit, Michigan, the two contractors for building a sewer on the Eight Mile road in front of plaintiffs’ respective properties. The two suits were combined and heard as one. The questions presented and the relief prayéd for in each one…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Myles Salt Co. v. Board of Comm'rs of Iberia and St. Mary Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Phillip Wagner, Inc. v. LeserSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Kinnie v. BareMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Warren v. City of Grand HavenMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Hinkley v. BishoppMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Township of Lake v. MillarMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Jeruzal v. Wayne County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Anselmi v. City of Rock SpringsWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
- Eyde Bros. Development Co. v. Eaton County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Royal Oak Drain Dist., Oakland County, Mich. v. KeefeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.