Legal Opinion
Sears v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 29, 1979No. 77-004, 77-129PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
These are actions to review decisions to the Department of Industry, Labor and Human Relations. (DILHR). In each case DILHR affirmed decisions of the Appeal Tribunal which determined that certain individuals known as “catalog sales merchants” in the case of Sears, and as “catalog sales agents” in the case of Montgomery Ward (Ward) were employees -within the meaning of sec. 108.02(3), Stats., and that Sears and Ward were liable for past due and delinquent unemployment compensation contributions. DILHR also affirmed that portion of the Appeal Tribunal’s decisions determining that employees of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- R. T. Madden, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Transport Oil, Inc. v. CummingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Jahns v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Price County Telephone Co. v. LordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Princess House, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Stafford Trucking, Inc. v. State, Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- Pinter Construction Co. v. FrisbyUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Robert Hansen Trucking, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Elder v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.