Legal Opinion

Pinter Construction Co. v. Frisby

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1984No. 18432PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

The plaintiffs, Joe Pinter Construction Company and the State Insurance Fund, seek reversal of an Industrial Commission order directing them to pay worker’s compensation benefits to Clifford Frisby, the defendant, who was injured while constructing a metal building for Pinter. Pinter and the Insurance Fund claim that the Commission erred in ruling that Pinter Construction Company exercised the degree of control over Frisby necessary to make Frisby an employee rather than an independent contractor.

In April, 1979, Pinter Construction agreed to build a maintenance building for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Utah Department of Administrative Services v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Bambrough v. BethersUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Young v. Environmental Air Products, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Word v. Motorola, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hurley v. Board of Review of the Industrial Commission of Utah, Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Bennett v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Glover Ex Rel. Dyson v. Boy Scouts of AmericaUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Vigos v. Mountainland Builders, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API