Legal Opinion

Fignani v. City of Lewiston

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1971No. 10661PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial to Leo Fignani and Neva Fignani, plaintiffs-respondents, in a negligence action, after a jury trial at which the City of Lewiston and Richard W. Thomas, defendants-appellants, were found negligent and liable for damages in the amount of $2,000. The trial judge, upon timely motion by the Fignanis for a new trial, granted the motion unless the appellants consented to an additur of $3,000, on the grounds that the jury failed to allow adequate damages. Appellants refused to consent to the additur, and a new trial was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sanchotena v. Tower Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Say v. HodginIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Timmerman v. SchroederSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Paullus v. LiedkieIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Bernier v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dinneen v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Smith v. Great Basin Grain Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Dinneen v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API