Fignani v. City of Lewiston
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McQUADE, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial to Leo Fignani and Neva Fignani, plaintiffs-respondents, in a negligence action, after a jury trial at which the City of Lewiston and Richard W. Thomas, defendants-appellants, were found negligent and liable for damages in the amount of $2,000. The trial judge, upon timely motion by the Fignanis for a new trial, granted the motion unless the appellants consented to an additur of $3,000, on the grounds that the jury failed to allow adequate damages. Appellants refused to consent to the additur, and a new trial was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sanchotena v. Tower Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Say v. HodginIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
- Timmerman v. SchroederSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Paullus v. LiedkieIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
- Bernier v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dinneen v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Smith v. Great Basin Grain Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Dinneen v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.