Legal Opinion

Sanchotena v. Tower Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1953No. 7943PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

Appellants, hereinafter referred to as defendants, appealed from an order of the court below granting the motion of respondent, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, for a new trial.

The action was instituted by plaintiff to recover damage to his crops in the sum of $8310 claimed to have been suffered by reason of the defendants’ having failed to deliver a pump that would pump 200 miner’s inches of water from the Snake River to his farm lands located west of Burley in Cassia County, Idaho.

Plaintiff was entitled to pump 250 miner’s inches of water for irrigation purposes upon…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Checketts v. BowmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Baldwin v. EwingIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Idaho Gold Dredging Corp. v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Poston v. HollarIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Hepp v. AderIdaho Supreme Court · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Dinneen v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Blaine v. ByersIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Smith v. Great Basin Grain Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Seppi v. BettyIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. O'DELL v. BasabeIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API