Legal Opinion

Dinneen v. Finch

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1979No. 12462Published

1Opinion of the Court

603 P.2d 575 (1979)

100 Idaho 620

Michael D. DINNEEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

James C. FINCH, and City of Wardner, a Municipal Corporation, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 12462.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

November 28, 1979.

Robert H. Whaley of Winston & Cashatt, Spokane, Wash., Michael E. McNichols, Orofino, for plaintiff-appellant.

Paul D. McCabe, Samuel Eismann, Coeur d'Alene, for defendants-respondents.

BISTLINE, Justice.

In this case we are required to consider first, the function of a trial judge when faced with a motion for a new trial based upon inadequate damages and, second, the function of this…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Dinneen v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Pierstorff v. Gray's Auto ShopIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Blaine v. ByersIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Big Butte Ranch, Inc. v. GrasmickIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API