Dinneen v. Finch
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
603 P.2d 575 (1979)
100 Idaho 620
Michael D. DINNEEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James C. FINCH, and City of Wardner, a Municipal Corporation, Defendants-Respondents.
No. 12462.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
November 28, 1979.
Robert H. Whaley of Winston & Cashatt, Spokane, Wash., Michael E. McNichols, Orofino, for plaintiff-appellant.
Paul D. McCabe, Samuel Eismann, Coeur d'Alene, for defendants-respondents.
BISTLINE, Justice.
In this case we are required to consider first, the function of a trial judge when faced with a motion for a new trial based upon inadequate damages and, second, the function of this…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Dinneen v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Pierstorff v. Gray's Auto ShopIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- Blaine v. ByersIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
- Big Butte Ranch, Inc. v. GrasmickIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.