Legal Opinion
Harding & Shelton, Inc. v. Prospective Investment & Trading Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 20, 2005No. 100,424PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RONALD J. STUBBLEFIELD, Judge.
¶ 1 These are multiple appeals from judgments in the third of a series of lawsuits dealing with ownership of a leasehold interest and resulting liability. Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff Prospective Investment and Trading Company, Ltd. (PITCO), appeals from the Trial Court’s money judgment in favor of Plaintiff Harding & Shelton, Inc. (Harding & Shelton) and Third-Party Defendant Consolidated American Resources, L.L.C. (Consolidated or, jointly, Operators). Operators appeal from the Trial Court’s post-judgment order severely limiting their recovery…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Forest Oil Corp. v. Corporation Com'n of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Tenneco Oil Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Garrett v. Arrowhead Improvement Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burwell v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- CHARTER OAK PRODUCTION CO. v. MorganCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- Bowen v. TuckerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007