Tenneco Oil Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Justice:
The cleavage within this Court, as demonstrated by this case, arises from deciding whether, after a forced-pooling order is issued by the Oklahoma Corporation Commission, the parties named as operator, and as electee or poolee, may contract between themselves to enlarge or otherwise define the terms set forth in the pooling order. Restated the question posed is this: may the interested parties to a forced-pooling order contract as to interests created, duties defined, terms of participation, operations, etc.?. We hold they may.
A majority of this Court believes that such a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Story v. HefnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Woods Petroleum Corp. v. SledgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Hayden v. DannenbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Cabot Carbon Company v. Phillips Petroleum CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Pasternak v. Lear Petroleum Exploration, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Bowen v. Amoco Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Rogers v. QuikTrip Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- Brumark Corp. v. Samson Resources Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Marshall v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.