Legal Opinion

Meerscheidt v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1997No. 96-26 to 96-28 and 96-33PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

These eases arose out of the same criminal conduct and were consolidated by this Court for oral argument and decision. Appellants Troy Meerscheidt, Matt Bennett, and Nate Dobson appeal from the judgments and sentences which the district court entered after each of them pleaded guilty to two counts of felony property destruction. Appellant Mike David appeals from the judgment and sentence which the district court entered after he pleaded guilty to two counts of first-degree arson.

We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

ISSUES

Meerscheidt presents the following issues for…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Parker Land & Cattle Co. v. Wyoming Game & Fish CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  3. Rasmussen v. BakerWyoming Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Billis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State Department of Revenue & Taxation v. PacificorpWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Olsen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Hampton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Yetter v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Penner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Petroleum Inc. v. State Ex Rel. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API