In Re Spring Brook Farm Foundation, Inc.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
Today, we conclude that the exchange element of the commercial purpose test for determining Act 250 (10 V.S.A. §§ 6001-6108) jurisdiction incorporates projects where a third person pays the provider of the facility goods or services for the benefit of another. Accordingly, we affirm the Environmental Board’s decision requiring Spring Brook Farm Foundation, Inc. (Foundation), a charitable organization, to obtain an Act 250 land use permit prior to constructing a dormitory/residence hall on a 44.5-acre tract.
The Foundation is a New York not-for-profit corporation recognized by the Internal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Agency of Administration, Etc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Trombley v. Bellows Falls Union High School District No. 27Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Bisson v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- In Re Southview AssociatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Nash v. Warren Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re Village Associates Act 250 Land Use PermitSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- In re Request for Jurisdictional Opinion re: Changes in Physical Structure and Use at Burlington International Airport for F-35ASupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Bethel v. Mount Anthony Union High School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- State v. RolfeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- In Re Appeal of S-S Corp./Rooney Housing DevelopmentsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.