Legal Opinion
In Re Appeal of S-S Corp./Rooney Housing Developments
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 13, 2006No. 04-080PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.
¶ 1. S-S Corporation1 appeals an Environmental Board declaratory ruling requiring it to obtain an Act 250 permit for two houses it constructed for use as residential care facilities. The Board concluded the construction of the houses was “development” under 10 V.S.A. § 6001(3)(A)(iv) and Environmental Board Rule 2(A)(1)(c) because together they consist of ten or more units and are “commercial dwellings” under Rule 2(M). S-S Corp. appeals both of these conclusions. We affirm the Board’s rulings.
¶ 2. Yvonne and Catherine Rooney operate residential care homes for physically and mentally disabled…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re DenioSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Committee to Save the Bishop's House, Inc. v. Medical Center Hospital of Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- In Re Appeal of Bennington School, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Costley v. Caromin House, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- In Re Wal Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Appeal of Times & Seasons, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- In re Confluence Behavioral Health, LLC Conditional Use to Operate a Therapeutic Community Residence Program (Jason Albert, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- In Re Champlain College Maple Street DormitorySupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Kay v. City of Rancho Palos VerdesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- In re Appeal of M.V.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.