Legal Opinion

In Re Village Associates Act 250 Land Use Permit

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 18, 2010No. 2009-171PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

¶ 1. Appellant/developer appeals imposition of an off-site mitigation fee assessed pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(9)(B)(iv) because of the presence of 10.85 acres of “primary agricultural soils” on the site of a proposed affordable *117housing development.1 Developer contends that the Environmental Court erred by refusing to consider the cost of removing trees from the land in assessing whether it should be classified as primary agricultural soils. Because we agree with developer that the Environmental Court erred in its interpretation of the statute, we reverse and remand to the Environmental…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Braun v. Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. In Re Appeal of GulliSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  3. Swett v. Haig's, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  4. In Re Route 103 QuarrySupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  5. In Re Nehemiah Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. In re SP Land Co., LLC, Act 250 LUP AmendmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. In re Korrow Real Estate, LLC Act 250 Permit Amendment Application (State of Vermont, Appellant)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  3. City of Montpelier v. Barnett, Sanborn and Natural Resources BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  4. State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. Parkway CleanersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
  5. In Re Times and Seasons, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API