Legal Opinion

Bethel v. Mount Anthony Union High School District

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 12, 2002No. 01-276PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant, Michael Bethel, sought a declaratory judgment in superior court, brought pursuant to 12 V.S.A. § 4711, to determine the validity of a 1998 amendment to an agreement which established the Mount Anthony Union High School District. Appellee, the Mount Anthony Union High School District, filed a motion to dismiss, pursuant to V.R.C.P. 12(b), premised on a claim that the appellant’s complaint was time-barred. In a subsequent motion for summary judgment, appellant asked the superior court to declare the amendments invalid. The court below granted the appellee’s motion to dismiss, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Richards v. Town of NorwichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Amiot v. AmesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  3. Levinsky v. DiamondSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. Muzzy v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. Brennan v. Town of ColchesterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. MORGAN STANLEY & CO., INC.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  2. Smith v. DesautelsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  3. Carole Kuligoski, Individually and On Behalf of Michael J. Kuligoski, and Mark Kuligoski and James Kuligoski v. Brattleboro Retreat and Northeast Kingdom Human ServicesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  4. Wesolow v. Town of LowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  5. Carole Kuligoski, Individually and On Behalf of Michael J. Kuligoski, and Mark Kuligoski and James Kuligoski v. Brattleboro Retreat and Northeast Kingdom Human ServicesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API