Legal Opinion

Swarzwald v. Cooley

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1934No. Docket No. L.A. 13331PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

The record shows an action by plaintiffs Swarzwald and a cross-action by defendant Cooley, both in form to quiet title and to locate the oceanward extremity of a common boundary line. The bank and the other defendants are only nominally interested in the result of this litigation, the former being the trustee and the latter beneficiaries under a real estate subdivision trust, of which the lands in question are a part.

The controlling question is the true location of the common point in the line of ordinary high tide, or mean high tidé, of the Pacific Ocean, which, in May and June, 1927, marked…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnston v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  2. Allen v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Menasha Wooden Ware Co. v. LawsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Brown v. SpreckelsHawaii Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Fraser's Million Dollar Pier Co. v. Ocean Park Pier Co.California Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spath v. LarsenWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Swarzwald v. CooleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Jansky v. City of Two RiversWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Kendall v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Murphy v. Drakes Bay Oyster Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API