Legal Opinion

Kendall v. Walker

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 2010No. A105981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.

—Pauli C. Walker and Margery F. Walker (collectively defendants) appeal after the trial court granted Alvin H. Luckenbach and Maria E. Luckenbach’s (collectively plaintiffs) 1 motion for summary judgment. On appeal, defendants challenge the trial court’s (1) denial of their motions for leave to amend and supplement their answer and cross-complaint, and (2) grant of plaintiffs’ motions for summary adjudication of issues and summary judgment. We affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs own a residential subdivision lot (lot 102) in the town of Bethel…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Sangster v. PaetkauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Marks v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Mills v. Forestex Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Mosley v. Pacific Specialty Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Mosley v. Pacific Specialty Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Riddle v. Vallely CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API