Legal Opinion
Szot v. Allstate Insurance
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 24, 2001No. Civil Action AW-99-3855PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Emme Szot, brings this diversity action against her former employer, Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”). Based upon the events surrounding her discharge, Ms. Szot asserts claims of breach of her employment contract (Count I) and defamation (Count II). Currently pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [15-1]. The motion has been fully briefed by all parties. No hearing is deemed necessary. See Local Rule 105.6. Upon consideration of the arguments made in support of, and opposition to, the motion, the Court…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dulude v. Fletcher Allen Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Mazer v. Safeway, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Linker v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Horton v. CullenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.