Legal Opinion

William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. Hutchins

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1907PublishedCited by 6 opinions

EXCEPTIONS FROM ClRCuiT CoüRT, ÉlBST O1RCUIT.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HARTWELL,, C.J.

This was an action of replevin to recover certain rails, joints, spikes, switches, cars, locomotives, trucks, scales, lumber and *512materials which the Kona Sugar Company had obtained from the plaintiff for a plantation railway over land of which the company owned the roadway for about one-third of a mile, an undivided interest for a little less than two-thirds of a mile, the rest of the roadway being held by the company partly under a license and partly by lease. The defendant claimed the property as purchaser at a receiver’s sale of the Kona Sugar…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. McChesney v. Kona Sugak Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1904
  4. W. W. Bierce, Ltd. v. HutchinsHawaii Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Coney v. MitamuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. WaterhouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Blueearth Biofuels, Llc v. Hawaiian Electric Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Horner v. HornerHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  4. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. WaterhouseHawaii Supreme Court · 1909
  5. United States v. BowerDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API