Legal Opinion

Horner v. Horner

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal dtrom Circuit Judge, Eirst Oircuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

ROBERTSON, C.J.

This suit was instituted by Robert Horner against Albert Horner for the dissolution of the partnership of J. M. Horner ■& Sons, and for an accounting. H. Hackfeld & Company, Limited, was also made a party defendant upon the claim that, as former agent of the firm, it had, during the year 1911, received certain moneys aggregating the sum of $32,500 of which it had paid to Albert Horner the sum of $15,410.42 which it was alleged was in excess of his proportionate share as a member of the firm, the balance remaining in the possession of said Hackfeld &…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brant v. Virginia Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Vail v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Loper v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  4. City of Ft. Scott v. W. G. Eads Brokerage Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  5. Leonard v. American InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. De Freitas v. CokeHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State v. Kahua Ranch, LimitedHawaii Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API