Legal Opinion

McChesney v. Kona Sugak Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Judge, Third Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PERRY, J.

(Galbraith, J., dissenting.)

In March, 1902, the complainants filed before the Circuit Judge of the Third Circuit, in equity, a bill, the main aver-*711ments of which were as follows: That the respondent, The Kona Sugar Co., was established for the purpose of cultivating sugar cane and manufacturing sugar and generally to carry on a sugar plantation and general agricultural business; that the respondent is indebted to the complainants in the sum of $189,826.05 for goods sold and delivered and for advances made; that the complainants hold the bonds of the respondent…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller Ex Rel. Continental Mortgage Investors v. Leadership Housing Systems, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  2. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. HutchinsHawaii Supreme Court · 1907
  3. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. HutchinsHawaii Supreme Court · 1907
  4. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. McChesneyHawaii Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Young v. WilliamsHawaii Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API