Legal Opinion

William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. Waterhouse

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Exceptions erom Circuit Court, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

BALLOU, J. (Wilder, J., dissenting.)

This is a bill of exceptions to review a judgment against the defendants, as executors of the will of Henry Waterhouse, upon a return bond in a replevin action executed by Henry Water-house as surety.

The replevin action was brought by the plaintiff against Clinton J. Hutchins, trustee, on July 20, 1903, and was for the recovery of certain railway material which had been used by *399the Ilona Sugar Co,, Ltd., the property of which corporation had been bought by Hutchins at a receiver’s sale. Plaintiff alleged in its declaration that the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Miller v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Reese v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1865

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. WaterhouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. WaterhouseHawaii Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API