Weeks Ex Rel. Weeks v. Barnard
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PER CüRiam.
Between the ages of 7 and 14, a minor is presumed to be incapable of contributory negligence. Ennis v. Dupree, 258 N.C. 141, 128 S.E. 2d 231; Phillips v. R. R., 257 N.C. 239, 125 S.E. 2d 603. This presumption, however, may be overcome by evidence that the child did not use the care which a child of its age, capacity, discretion, knowledge, and experience would ordinarily have exercised under the same or similar circumstances. Walston v. Greene, 247 N.C. 693, 102 S.E. 2d 124; Caudle v. R. R., 202 N.C. 404, 163 S.E. 122. A child “must exercise care and prudence equal to his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hughes v. . ThayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Tart Ex Rel. Tart v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Walston v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Caudle v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Foard Ex Rel. Foard v. Tidewater Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Crawford v. Wayne County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Simmons Ex Rel. Simmons v. Columbus County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Wooten v. CagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Hoots v. BeesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.