Legal Opinion
Caudle v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided March 23, 1932PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClabksoN, J.
We think there were sufficient facts alleged in the complaint to constitute actionable negligence, and the court below properly overruled the demurrer of defendant.
“If negligence on the part of the defendant is established and the jury should also find that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, on the ground that he was negligent in going into a dangerous position without being properly attentive to his own safety, the facts seem to require the submission of a third issue involving the question whether the defendant, in this instance, negligently failed to avail himself of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Deans v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Lassiter v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Earwood v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Perry v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Baltimore City Passenger Ry. Co. v. CooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ingram v. . Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Wade Ex Rel. Wade v. Jones Sausage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Adams Ex Rel. Adams v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Walston v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Newbern v. . LearySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.