Legal Opinion

Tart Ex Rel. Tart v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 8, 1932PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Whether other error prejudicial to the defendants was committed during the trial in the municipal court is a matter with which we need have no concern if the Superior Court was correct in dismissing the action, and this question we must determine by giving to the evidence such construction as is most favorable to the plaintiff. Given this interpretation the evidence tends to establish the following facts:

The plaintiff was injured at the Taylor Street crossing in the city of High Point. At this place the defendants have five tracks extending northeast and southwest: a sidetrack, a passing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Rolin v. . Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Eller v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Murray v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. Foard Ex Rel. Foard v. Tidewater Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Wagoner v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Parker v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Jeffries v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API