Legal Opinion

City of Wichita v. Wyman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 26, 1944No. 36,170PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, C. J.:

This is an original action in mandamus to determine whether the city of Wichita may act as self-insurer in respect to the payment of compensation which may be awarded to the city’s employees injured in its service.

The compensation commissioner takes the position that the city is not authorized to act as self-insurer, and declines to give his sanction to its acting in that capacity.

An examination of pertinent provisions of the workmen’s compensation act and some reference to our previous decisions will develop the legal question. G. S.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. NagleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. City of Arkansas City v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. State ex rel. Weber v. YounkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. State ex rel. Griffith v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Stevens v. McDowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Warren v. MARION COUNTYOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Dilger v. School District 24CJOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. International Ass'n of Firefighters Local 1596 v. City of LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
  4. City of Chicago v. KorshakAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Clayton v. Village of Oak ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API