Legal Opinion

Stevens v. McDowell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 27, 1940No. 34,698PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, C. J.:

Plaintiffs invoke our original jurisdiction in mandamus to require the defendant, a judge of the city court of Kansas City, to certify to the district court certain proceedings in forcible detainer pending in his court on the ground that they had progressed to a point where it was clear that the title to real property was in dispute.

The pertinent facts, in brief, are these:. On October 20, 1939, one Samuel Bobrecker filed in division No. 2 of the city court of Kansas City, presided over by the defendant, Joseph H. McDowell, a complaint in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Drollinger v. CarsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Bishop v. FischerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Ditzen v. GivenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. Courtney v. WoodworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  5. Estey v. HoldrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Fancher v. Carson-Campbell, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. Jackson & Scherer, Inc. v. WashburnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  4. Wright v. HerzogCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  5. Christy Et Ux. v. Guild Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1942

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API