Legal Opinion

City of Arkansas City v. Turner

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 16, 1924No. 25,775PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This is an original action in mandamus to require the state auditor to register a proposed issue of bonds to pay for certain internal improvements in Arkansas City. The plaintiff is a city of the second class, having taxable property within its limits aggregating $11,905,520 in assessed value; the city’s aggregate bonded debt is $2,238,717.21, of which sum $1,576,046.77 is for improvements to be paid for eventually by the property particularly benefited thereby, and the remainder, $662,670.44, binds the city at large and is to be paid by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lamar v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. State v. NagleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. State ex rel. Taggart v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. County Commissioners v. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  5. Wilson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. WoodmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  3. State ex rel. Boynton v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  4. Kershaw v. BRULEIGH COUNTYNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API