Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Korshak

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 6, 1995No. 1-92-2604PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rizzi

This is an appeal by attorney Clinton Krislov from a judgment denying his petition for attorney fees as attorney for a class of intervenors, Martin Ryan et al. (Intervenors), in a suit brought by plaintiff City of Chicago (City) against defendants Marshall Korshak et al., as trustees of four City pension funds. We affirm.

This litigation began in 1987 when the City sued the trustees (Trustees) of its four pension funds: (1) Policemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund; (2) Firemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund; (3) Municipal Employees’, Officers’ and Officials’ Annuity and Benefit Fund; and (4) the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. LutzIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Baier v. State Farm Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Hamer v. KirkIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  5. City of East Peoria v. Group Five Development Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morris B. Chapman & Associates, Ltd. v. KitzmanIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Morris B. Chapman & Associates, Ltd. v. KitzmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. MORRIS B. CHAPMAN & ASSOCIATES v. KitzmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Nicholson v. Marine Corps West Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  5. Morris B. Chapman & Associates, LTD. v. KitzmanIllinois Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API