Legal Opinion

People v. Norman

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 1999No. B124801PublishedCited by 11 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (Miriam A.), J.

Jonathan Norman was convicted of stalking, with allegations that he had suffered two prior strikes and served one prior prison term found true. In the published portion of this opinion, we reject Norman’s contention that, to constitute stalking in violation of Penal Code section 646.9, the victim’s fear must be contemporaneous with the stalker’s threats and harassment. In the unpublished portion of this opinion, we reject Norman’s remaining claims of error.

Facts

On June 23, 1997, Steven Spielberg (the victim) left his Pacific Palisades residence and flew to Ireland,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. People v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. LoeunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. People v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. People v. David L.California Court of Appeal · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fernando Malta-Espinoza v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. The People v. McPheetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. In re HochSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. MALTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2004
  5. Fernando Malta-Espinoza v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API