Legal Opinion
Fernando Malta-Espinoza v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 2, 2007No. 04-71140PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
CANBY, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
The petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED. The memorandum disposition filed on June 30, 2005, 137 FedAppx. 985, is withdrawn and is replaced by an opinion and dissent filed contemporaneously with this order.
The petition for rehearing en banc is dismissed as moot.
OPINION
Fernando Malta-Espinoza, a native and citizen of Mexico who is a permanent resident of the United States, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) holding that Malta-Espinoza’s state-law conviction for stalking rendered him removable under 8 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Fernandez-Ruiz v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Sareang Ye v. Immigration and Naturalization Service and United States Attorney General Janet RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. VannCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Gomez-LeonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Young v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Reina-Rodriguez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.