Legal Opinion
MALTA
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2004No. ID 3498PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
23 I&N Dec. 656
(BIA 2004) Interim Decision #3498 In re Fernando MALTA-Espinoza, Respondent File A92 717 834 - Eloy Decided March 11, 2004 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals A stalking offense for harassing conduct in violation of section 646.9(b) of the California Penal Code, which proscribes stalking when there is a temporary restraining order, injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the stalking behavior, is a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 16(b) (2000), and is therefore an aggravated felony under…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sareang Ye v. Immigration and Naturalization Service and United States Attorney General Janet RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Miguel Trinidad-AquinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Michael Charles JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Jeffrey Dean BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Esly Pereira-SalmeronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- U. SINGHBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2012
- SANCHEZ-LOPEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2012