Legal Opinion

Fernando Malta-Espinoza v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 2, 2007No. 04-71140Published

1Opinion of the Court

478 F.3d 1080

Fernando MALTA-ESPINOZA, Petitioner,

v.

Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-71140.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 15, 2005.

Filed March 2, 2007.

Lory D. Rosenberg, IDEA Immigration Defense & Expert, Assistance Consultation, Darnestown, MD, for the petitioner.

William C. Erb, Jr., Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for the respondent.

Paul C. Workman, Holland & Knight, Los Angeles, CA, for the amicus curiae.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Fernandez-Ruiz v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API