McCoy v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
In this case we determine whether appellant’s jury conviction and sentences for three counts of second-degree sexual assault and one count of indecent liberties with a minor require reversal because trial counsel’s decisions concerning expert testimony violated his right to effective assistance of counsel. For the reasons explained below, we hold that reversal is not required.
ISSUES
McCoy states the issues as:
ISSUE #1:
Whether Trial Counsel failed to render effective assistance of counsel as guaranteed by the Constitution because of his following errors:
1. A failure to properly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Frias v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Gist v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. DanleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bloomquist v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Proffit v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Barkell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Osborne v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Lopez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.