Legal Opinion
Northern California River Watch v. City of Healdsburg
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 6, 2007No. 04-15442PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed August 10, 2006, slip op. 9299, and appearing at 457 F.3d 1023 (9th Cir.2006) is withdrawn, and a new opinion will be filed in its stead.
The Petitions for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc are otherwise DENIED, no further petitions for rehearing will be accepted.
OPINION
SCHROEDER, Chief Judge:
Defendant/Appellant City of Healdsburg (“Healdsburg”) appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of Plaintiff/ Appellee Northern California River Watch (“River Watch”), an environmental group, in this litigation under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). Plaintiff alleges that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Rapanos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Crittenden v. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. CundiffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Northern California River Watch v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.