Northern California River Watch v. Wilcox

ORDER

The unopposed motion of the United States, as amicus curiae, to clarify the court’s Opinion is granted as follows:

The Opinion, filed on August 25, 2010, and reported at 620 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir.2010), is amended as follows:

At Slip Op. 12801, [620 F.3d at 1089-90], the first full paragraph beginning with <the broad sweep > and ending with <a majority opinion)). > is deleted and replaced with:

*769The broad sweep of the Corps’ authority to regulate was sharply debated in Rapanos, in which the Court split 4-1-4 with regard to the limits of the Corps’ regulatory jurisdiction of non-adjacent…