United States v. Cundiff
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.
After eight years of failed negotiations and ignored orders, the United States sued George Rudy Cundiff (who goes by Rudy) and his son, Christopher Seth Cundiff (who goes by Seth), seeking injunctive relief and civil penalties against them for discharging “pollutants” into “waters of the United States” without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. 33 U.S.C. § 1362. The district court granted summary judgment for the government, imposed injunctive relief in the form of a restoration plan for the Cundiffs’ wetlands, and imposed a civil penalty…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Peter Bormuth v. County of JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Alvin RayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- In Re Packaged Ice Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Premo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.