Legal Opinion
Crittenden v. Ayers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 2, 2010No. 05-99006PublishedCited by 127 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on August 20, 2010, slip op. 12331, and appearing at [620 F.3d 962] 2010 WL 3274506, is amended as follows:
In Section I.C.l of the opinion, at slip op. 12351 [620 F.3d at 972-73] 2010 WL 3274506, at *8, the first paragraph, which states:
Under Batson’s first step, the defendant must establish a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination. See Batson, 476 U.S. at 93-94 [106 S.Ct. 1712]. He must show that (1) he is a member of a “cognizable racial group,” (2) the prosecutor used a peremptory strike to remove a juror of defendant’s race and (3) the totality of the…
2Cases cited94 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by127 opinions
- Hooks v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- In re RenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Kenneth Hibbler v. James BenedettiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Flores, Ex Parte GerardoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Smithkline Beecham Corporation v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.