Legal Opinion
United States v. Robison
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 24, 2007No. 05-17019PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULL, Circuit Judge:
Defendants McWane, Inc. (“McWane”), James Delk (“Delk”), and Michael Devine (“Devine”) appeal their convictions for their roles in a Clean Water Act (“CWA”) conspiracy (Count 1), as well as their convictions for substantive violations of the CWA (Counts 2, 3, 5, 7-19, 21, and 22). 1 After the defendants’ convictions, the United States Supreme Court addressed how to define “navigable waters” under the CWA in Rapanos v. United States, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 2208, 165 L.Ed.2d 159 (2006). The definition of “navigable waters” in the jury charge in this case was erroneous under…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- United States v. Brenton-FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Scott Clabourne v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. CundiffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Swisher International, Inc. v. SchaferCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.