Legal Opinion

Colton v. O'Brien

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 13870PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYLER, J., pro tem.

Action to recover a real estate broker’s commission alleged to have been earned on an exchange of certain parcels of real property.

The complaint alleges that appellant employed respondent, a real estate broker, to exchange for her certain property, and executed and delivered to him a written agreement whereby she offered to exchange her equity, valued at $125,000, in real property owned by her in Portland, Oregon, for other property of a like value. The agreement among.other things provided that the broker had the auíhpí.ity"tb act as agent for all parties and accept…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wristen v. BowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wesley N. Taylor Co. v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Kopf v. MilamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Clements v. RankinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Phillips v. BartonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Keystone Mortgage Co. v. MacDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API