Naylor v. Ashton
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a new trial. Fred V. "Wood, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant, and the order denying plaintiff's motion for a new trial.
The action was brought by plaintiff as the assignee of Geo. H. Murdock Son to recover the sum of five hundred dollars as broker's commission under a written contract.
Murdock Son had the property of defendant, a ranch in Tehama County, listed for sale or exchange. Learning that one Mrs. Thompson owned a piece of real property in Oakland which she was desirous of exchanging for ranch property, they informed defendant thereof and sent her to see Mrs. Thompson. All the business was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Zeimer v. AntisellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Hicks v. PostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Brown v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Ropes v. John Rosenfeld's SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fitzpatrick v. UnderwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Lewis v. Western Truck LineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Backman v. Guadalupe Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- Fruen v. FruenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Hill v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.