Moody v. Kersey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
The sole question presented by this appeal is: Did the trial court err in entering the judgment of nonsuit at the close of plaintiff’s evidence?
Defendants contend there is not sufficient evidence of actionable negligence to permit the issue to be submitted to a jury.
We find no evidence in the record that will allow the reasonable inference that the signals given by Jefferson were the proximate cause of plaintiff’s injury. The signals given by him allowed defendant Kersey, without difficulty, to raise the chute from the ground and place it in position to be properly secured. All the evidence…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Mills v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Whitt v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Lewis v. BarnhillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McNair v. BoyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Shelton v. STEELCASE, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Truesdale v. University of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Meyer v. McCARLEY AND COMPANY, INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Carolina Beach Fishing Pier, Inc. v. Town of Carolina BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.