Legal Opinion

Meyer v. McCARLEY AND COMPANY, INC.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 26, 1975No. 106PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Justice.

The record reveals no material issue of fact between Wheat on the one hand and Anne Meyer and Elizabeth Meyer on the other. It is not controverted that each of them fully paid the purchase price of the 200 shares of Levitz stock held in her account by McCarley. The plaintiffs allege McCarley was given an order to sell such stock at a price, which could have been obtained on the day the order was given, while McCarley denies that it received an order to sell the stock owned by Anne Meyer and Elizabeth Meyer, but that is not a matter at issue as between these plaintiffs and Wheat.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. McNair v. BoyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Oliver v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Sterner v. PennCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Lavelle v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Bogle v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Lee v. Paragon Group Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API