Legal Opinion
State v. Russo
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 13, 1984No. CR 81-8-89 A26013 (Control), CR 81-8-99 CA A26014PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.
In these consolidated cases, defendants appeal their convictions for manufacturing marijuana in violation of ORS 475.992(1), contending that the trial court should have suppressed the marijuana seized. We agree. Accordingly, we reverse.
On March 22, 1981, while on patrol in a remote area of Curry County, Deputy Sheriff Gibson of Josephine County received an informal complaint that defendants’ dogs were running loose and chasing deer. He had previously received a similar complaint. Gibson attempted to contact defendants by driving to their house, which was located on 120 acres of mountainous…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Brinlee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1965
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- State v. IllingworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. FisherSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- State v. OhlingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. GabbardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- State v. Vann SuttonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.