Legal Opinion

State v. Carter

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 23, 1981No. 36087, CA 19433; 36086, CA A20310PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Defendants, in a consolidated appeal, seek reversal of their convictions for possession of a controlled substance (marijuana) on the ground that the court erred in refusing to suppress all evidence seized by police during a warrant-less search of defendants’ property. Because we conclude the warrantless search and seizure were unreasonable, we reverse.

The relevant facts are not disputed. State Police Trooper Miller, prior to the events in question, had received information from a confidential informant that marijuana was being grown on defendants’ property. He attempted to obtain a search…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. State v. StantonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. State v. HarpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. RussoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. State v. Hitesman/PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. RoundsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. State v. McIntyre/PereiraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Reich v. MinnicusDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API