Legal Opinion
Dodge v. Blood
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 6, 1941No. Docket No. 67, Calendar No. 41,639PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
Plaintiff sues in equity for specific performance of a contract. His bill of complaint was demurred to, and dismissed, and he appeals. The allegations of fact contained in the bill must, therefore, be taken as true. Insofar as such allegations relate to the circumstance's surrounding the making of the contract sued on, they are as follows:
“4. On October 15, 1940, at New York, plaintiff employed the services of * * * First of Michigan Corporation to negotiate sale to him by defendant of 63 shares of the capital stock of S. A. Woods Machine Company. * * *
“5. On October 16, 1940, at Detroit,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Byington v. SimpsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Argersinger v. . MacNaughtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Tobin v. LarkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Irvmor Corp. v. RodewaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Old Ben Coal Co. v. Universal Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Anthony J. GiacaloneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Sommers v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Cooper v. HilemanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Looman Realty Corp. v. Broad Street Nat. Bank of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Benedek v. Mechanical Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.