Legal Opinion
In Re Wilson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 31, 2008No. 08-BG-375PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”), in determining that the findings of a Hearing Committee were supported by substantial evidence in the record, has found that Joyce A. Wilson 1 violated Rules 1.15(a) (intentional misappropriation), 3.3(a)(1) (making false statements to a tribunal), 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), 8.1(b) (failing to respond to Bar counsel’s inquiries), 8.4(d) (conduct that seriously interfered with the administration of justice), and D.C. Bar R. XI, § 2(b)(3) (failing to comply with an order compelling the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re CarlsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re MabryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Matter of WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009