Legal Opinion

United States v. David Frederick Sherman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 18, 1991No. 89-50552PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:

OVERVIEW

David Frederick Sherman pled guilty to five counts of bank robbery and attempted bank robbery. His sentence was adjusted under the career offender provisions of the Sentencing Guidelines for having two prior convictions for crimes of violence. He appeals this adjustment, arguing that the district judge erred in determining that a prior state conviction for “burglary in the first degree using a firearm” was a crime of violence under § 4B1.2 of the Guidelines. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

On July 14, 1989, Sherman pled guilty to five of fifteen counts of bank robbery and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. Jeffrey Dean BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Walter Moray WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Gilbert Martinez-JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. State v. BaruthIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Patrick InnieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Henry Nash RileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. David H., JuvenileCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Michael McClentonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. James Earl MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API