Legal Opinion
United States v. Patrick Innie
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 5, 1993No. 92-50239PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether a sentencing court may determine a convicted defendant’s offense level based upon the total volume of a liquid mixture containing methamphetamine and whether being an accessory after the fact to murder for hire is a crime of violence under the 1989 Sentencing Guidelines.
I
In 1988, Patrick Innie failed to appear for sentencing after pleading guilty to being an accessory after the fact to the commission of murder for hire in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3. A warrant was issued for his arrest.
On February 16, 1989, Innie was arrested by the Culver City…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Juan Castillo, Aka: Luis Hong Rojas, United States of America v. Antonio De La RentaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Kevin J. SherbondyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- United States v. Hosvaldo LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. VidalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4598, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7402 United States of America v. Prakash Man Shrestha, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Yvonne N. AJUGWO, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Douglas Merrill NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.