Legal Opinion

United States v. David H., Juvenile

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 8, 1994No. 93-50395PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Per curiam

The United States filed an information under § 5032 of the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act charging David H. with committing armed bank robbery when he was seventeen, and moved to transfer David H. to adult status for criminal prosecution. Section 5032 required such a transfer if (1) the act charged was committed after the juvenile’s sixteenth birthday, (2) the act would have been a felony involving the use of violence if committed by an adult, and (3) the juvenile had previously been found guilty of such an offense. 1 To satisfy the last requirement, the government demonstrated that David…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. Boutilier v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. Jacob De La FuenteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. Becerril-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Juvenile Male 1Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Juvenile FemaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API